Cookies
We use essential cookies for authentication and security. With your permission, we also use analytics to improve the product.Learn more
Tesla FSD Lawsuit: Oracle Exec Wins $10,600 in Small Claims Court
May 21, 20262 min readCleanTechnica

Tesla FSD Lawsuit: Oracle Exec Wins $10,600 in Small Claims Court

Ben Gawiser, a director of software engineering at Oracle, has won $10,600 in a Texas small claims court case against Tesla. Gawiser had filed a claim against the company after he felt he was promised unsupervised Full Self Driving (FSD) by now. The lawsuit was filed despite class action lawsuits already ongoing in the US and Australia over similar issues with Tesla's FSD promises.

Gawiser's case is notable for its brevity, as it did not require a lengthy trial or extensive evidence presentation. Instead, Tesla failed to appear in court, allowing Gawiser to secure a default judgment against the company. This outcome highlights the potential risks and consequences of Tesla's delayed development timeline for FSD.

The awarded amount includes both $10,600 in damages and $72.88 in court costs. Gawiser had initially paid $6,000 for FSD in August 2019, while some customers had paid up to $15,000 at its peak price. The lack of communication from Tesla has been a significant concern for many customers.

Gawiser expressed frustration with the lack of updates or information from Tesla regarding his FSD status. 'I literally had zero communication from them, pretty much since I bought the car,' he stated. This radio silence has left many customers feeling uncertain and misled about the development timeline for FSD.

The outcome of Gawiser's case does not necessarily set a precedent for the larger class action lawsuits currently underway in the US and Australia. However, it serves as a reminder that Tesla's delayed development timeline may have consequences for its customers.

Tesla's FSD promises have been a subject of controversy and debate among customers and experts alike. The company has faced criticism for its slow pace of progress on developing autonomous driving technology.

The awarded amount is a significant victory for Gawiser, who had initially paid $6,000 for FSD in 2019. His case highlights the need for greater transparency and communication from Tesla regarding its development timeline and customer expectations.

As the situation with Tesla's FSD continues to unfold, customers like Gawiser will be watching closely to see how the company addresses these concerns and delivers on its promises.

The outcome of this small claims court case may have implications for Tesla's overall strategy and reputation in the automotive industry. With FSD still in development, customers are seeking clarity and assurance that their investments will yield results.

Tesla's handling of FSD has been a major point of contention among customers, with many feeling misled or frustrated by the company's slow pace of progress. This case serves as a reminder that accountability is essential for companies making promises about autonomous driving technology.

tesla full self drivingclass action lawsuitelon musk promises
Share this article

More in EV